Sepplord wrote: ↑Wed 14 Aug 2019 3:16 PM
Freedomcall wrote: ↑Wed 14 Aug 2019 3:01 PM
writing reduced dmg too will help ppl understand more correctly.
It is hard to believe that 50 was your solely 'mainhand' 'duel shadow' dmg, but if the combat log showed like 50(-29), you can assure that there was no ablative working. And if it was 50(-57), it is definately abla.
And i assume 130-150 he did was not the anytimer. I can't be perfectly sure cuz i didnt see the fight myself, but i think it mustve been reactives or positionals if required poisons were all applied.
Imo that would make it less transparent...the numbers in bracket are modifications to the actual dmg of the hit to the player.
Ablative shows as speellabsorb in a different color.
Mixing both together wouldn't make it more clear?
Of course, writing both will make it more clear.
But i sometimes see some ppl fail to find absorbs from combat log for some reason.
Then, this becomes the most possible to way to 'interpret' what happened.
Most of the absorbs ppl use is 50% one, and considering that 50 is an uncommon dmg as a Styled-dmg, I can 'assume' that 50% dmg reduction would've worked fully on that situation.
So you can calculate using the numbers in bracket to get a more closer look when you only have limited information.