In case noone cares: Well deserved! A real improvement for the server.
Ceen wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 8:30 AMThrowing away 7 month of your life and counting.
Yes RL flames are bad, but this is a level no one should gratz for. They need professional help.
florin wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:22 AMI think I’ve killed galantor more than any other hib or mid. Seen them fight very well and coordinated but account sharing is a sham and staff should feel bad for allowing it while banning hundreds for multi accounts
Druth wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:38 AMplaying from work, and for using my gaming laptop.florin wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:22 AMI think I’ve killed galantor more than any other hib or mid. Seen them fight very well and coordinated but account sharing is a sham and staff should feel bad for allowing it while banning hundreds for multi accounts
Druth wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:38 AMflorin wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:22 AMI think I’ve killed galantor more than any other hib or mid. Seen them fight very well and coordinated but account sharing is a sham and staff should feel bad for allowing it while banning hundreds for multi accounts
Just curious, and as I don't share I do not care, but how would this work if they disallowed this?
Only play on 1 computer/IP? I would be banned for playing from work, and for using my gaming laptop.
Implement detection system that notices you playing different than usually? I would be banned if I used a different mouse, or if I let my son nuke some while I watched, just because he wanted to kill some badies.
Identifying 2 people using an account is much much harder than identifying 1 person using 2 accounts.
Don't need to be a genius to farm coast guard's behind the task keep. Ppl rush in there none stop solo, don't need to have radar for that. just use your brain.Tarticus74 wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:46 AMAmazing how they always find the fights and just appear at the right time lol 😉
Tarticus74 wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:46 AMGrats I guess did you ding it on me when you feel the need to roll me as a solo......
Amazing how they always find the fights and just appear at the right time lol 😉
Time spent will always equal RPs but we'll done
Hector wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 11:21 PMServer open 7 months... a million 11L0+ chars... wipe and restart thanks
MiNDmaZing wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 5:29 PMif my grandma makes an account for me it counts as a different person, but everyone can play it. And thats exactly what they do. If one guy creates two accounts its bannable. Sure should you be able to play a friends account, but not 20 people and that everyday 24/7.
Sepplord wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 7:34 AMMiNDmaZing wrote: ↑Wed 7 Aug 2019 5:29 PMif my grandma makes an account for me it counts as a different person, but everyone can play it. And thats exactly what they do. If one guy creates two accounts its bannable. Sure should you be able to play a friends account, but not 20 people and that everyday 24/7.
i don't mind people sharing accounts but you do have a point there...
on one hand we have people getting banned because of the computer their account was created on (and while i respect the staff in almost all of their decisions, this one in particular feels off....there are plenty of very likely scenarios why a person could make their account on the computer off someone else), and on the other we have people basically using multiple accounts via "sharing" the account of someone else.
Druth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 7:44 AMBut how...?
Multi account is "easy", especially when across realms.
Plat for $ is doable with some detective work.
Bug abuse is obvious.
But how do you detect when someone else is using an account?
Sepplord wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 8:31 AMDruth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 7:44 AMBut how...?
Multi account is "easy", especially when across realms.
Plat for $ is doable with some detective work.
Bug abuse is obvious.
But how do you detect when someone else is using an account?
Someone accessing an account 100km or miles away from last login point, a minute after logging out, for example.
My point is more though, that the 1PC = 1account rule, has loads of false positives too. When someone shows someone else the game, it would be natural for me to let them make their own account (if they were intrested) and "playtest" on their own account. That way they don't lose process when going home and deciding to keep playing. I am not even sure if during name-reservation weekend, my brother logged in at my house to reserve a name. We played beta before, so had accounts...but if he wouldn't ave had one, he would have created one from my PC. And then now his account would be perma banned (at least that's how i interpret the current discussions and rulechanges).
Even with people living in the same household, there are reason for separate accounts. Sharing access to everything ingame requires trust and equal knowledge about the game...especially with your kids playing i am sure that can lead to problems between siblings. And now with accountwide gold it is impossible to share an account while each person keeping their own funds, even if everyone is responsible and trustworthy. And when you get more computers down the road...then one person has to start completely over? I could go on and on about it.
Yeah, if the multiple created accounts start crossrealming or breaking other rules, sure hit them hard. But simply perma-ing all but one account that were created from one computer seems like a sure thing to hit loads of innocent members of the community (and it is pure luck that it hasn't hit me or one of my friends, everyone with loads of playtime on their respective accounts)
Hey Marco Rubio - how about this? Let’s not get innocents caught in the dragnet of a crappy defined rule and half ass investigationDruth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 10:08 AMSepplord wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 8:31 AMDruth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 7:44 AMBut how...?
Multi account is "easy", especially when across realms.
Plat for $ is doable with some detective work.
Bug abuse is obvious.
But how do you detect when someone else is using an account?
Someone accessing an account 100km or miles away from last login point, a minute after logging out, for example.
My point is more though, that the 1PC = 1account rule, has loads of false positives too. When someone shows someone else the game, it would be natural for me to let them make their own account (if they were intrested) and "playtest" on their own account. That way they don't lose process when going home and deciding to keep playing. I am not even sure if during name-reservation weekend, my brother logged in at my house to reserve a name. We played beta before, so had accounts...but if he wouldn't ave had one, he would have created one from my PC. And then now his account would be perma banned (at least that's how i interpret the current discussions and rulechanges).
Even with people living in the same household, there are reason for separate accounts. Sharing access to everything ingame requires trust and equal knowledge about the game...especially with your kids playing i am sure that can lead to problems between siblings. And now with accountwide gold it is impossible to share an account while each person keeping their own funds, even if everyone is responsible and trustworthy. And when you get more computers down the road...then one person has to start completely over? I could go on and on about it.
Yeah, if the multiple created accounts start crossrealming or breaking other rules, sure hit them hard. But simply perma-ing all but one account that were created from one computer seems like a sure thing to hit loads of innocent members of the community (and it is pure luck that it hasn't hit me or one of my friends, everyone with loads of playtime on their respective accounts)
First of all, and with the risk of becoming unpopular... lets dispense with the "loads of innocent" people. "Loads of people professing innocence" might be true.
Remember, just because your "bestsest" friend in DaoC says he doesn't cheat, doesn't make it any less true or a lie.
Second, to my knowledge the intent is for households to be able to play together, with each of their own account, and in the same realm.
Many are being investigated, and some are likely just that, and most will be "freed" again.
That brings us back to several people using same account.
The rules of multi account are crystal clear.
Same IP address: X persons X accounts 1 realm.
There is no proximity rule, that says people in your neighborhood has to play same realm as you.
You want to bring in a proximity rule, that can be extremely arbitrary.
What should the distance and time to re-log be? Should it take into account city and traffic?
50 miles in rural and urban area is not the same in regards to travel time.
Would it stop people sharing account? Or would they just wait 30 mins, and then log in?
What if I forgot to log out at home, and went to work. It autologs after what... 30 mins? I arrive at work and log in, technically making it 1 min.
Should I be banned?
Can I let my daughter play my account?
Rules are great, but if you can't make them simple, they are really bad.
And again, Galantor would have been RR11l3 if he only played half the time. Which excuses would people then give for them still being in the top?
florin wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 11:50 AM
Let’s dispense the myth that you have made points worth discussing
Druth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 12:00 PM
Lets delve into that you said you have not been affected by the bans, and yet know how the bans have been done, and investigated?
My guess is someone told you they are innocent, and you've build your opinion upon that.
Druth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 10:08 AMFirst of all, and with the risk of becoming unpopular... lets dispense with the "loads of innocent" people. "Loads of people professing innocence" might be true.
Remember, just because your "bestsest" friend in DaoC says he doesn't cheat, doesn't make it any less true or a lie.
Second, to my knowledge the intent is for households to be able to play together, with each of their own account, and in the same realm.
Many are being investigated, and some are likely just that, and most will be "freed" again.
That brings us back to several people using same account.
The rules of multi account are crystal clear.
Same IP address: X persons X accounts 1 realm.
There is no proximity rule, that says people in your neighborhood has to play same realm as you.
You want to bring in a proximity rule, that can be extremely arbitrary.
What should the distance and time to re-log be? Should it take into account city and traffic?
50 miles in rural and urban area is not the same in regards to travel time.
Would it stop people sharing account? Or would they just wait 30 mins, and then log in?
What if I forgot to log out at home, and went to work. It autologs after what... 30 mins? I arrive at work and log in, technically making it 1 min.
Should I be banned?
Can I let my daughter play my account?
Rules are great, but if you can't make them simple, they are really bad.
And again, Galantor would have been RR11l3 if he only played half the time. Which excuses would people then give for them still being in the top?
florin wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 12:22 PMI believe some of them as being honest mistakes. It’s a very easy mistake to be made. Even experienced veterans of the games could read the old rules and say ok 1 account 1 person and not think they would need 2 computers solely for account creation. This has been established. Mistakes have been made.
Now some are scoundrels creating multiple accounts to radar, buff bot and cross realm and trade plat for cash. These witches should burn.
But in no other facet of life would I accept mass banning and then doing “investigations”.
You know something else? Data privacy rules like GDPR (article 22) has some opinion on automated decisions based of personally identifiable information - of which IP address and hard drive serial number are part of.
Do you recall signing a terms of service consenting to having an algorithm automate your access here you explicitly consented to what information is captured and stored?
Sepplord wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 12:25 PM"loads of" is a pretty vague statement, i am aware that most people claiming to be innocent aren't.
As i said, i don’t mind sharing. You asked how to enforce it, and I gave an example that might be applicable. Of course not perfect, but you could put the threshold at 1000miles and 5minutes and exclude all examples of false positives you just mentioned. It’s a question of where you want to put the slider between “false positives“----|-------”uncaught violators”. But that variable exists in any system. You could, for example catch every single cheater, by simply banning every account in existence, and you can avoid banning even one innocent by not banning anyone at all. It is obvious that neither of those extremes is a good solution, but the same train of thought applies to all other positions of the slider.
The only problem i see currently is the rule about accounts being created on one computer. Using this as a FLAG for investigation isn't a problem, but the rules got changed to make it a bannable offense to create an account from a computer that has previously been used to create an account. And not even from now, ongoing (then i would say, their fault for not reading the rules) but retroactive.
I just hope that staff doesn'T dismiss all requests regarding unbanning permabanned accounts because of this, but so far it doesn't seem like they do, and the rules now clearly state using one PC for multiple accounts is equal to multi-accounting
Druth wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 12:33 PMflorin wrote: ↑Thu 8 Aug 2019 12:22 PMI believe some of them as being honest mistakes. It’s a very easy mistake to be made. Even experienced veterans of the games could read the old rules and say ok 1 account 1 person and not think they would need 2 computers solely for account creation. This has been established. Mistakes have been made.
Now some are scoundrels creating multiple accounts to radar, buff bot and cross realm and trade plat for cash. These witches should burn.
But in no other facet of life would I accept mass banning and then doing “investigations”.
You know something else? Data privacy rules like GDPR (article 22) has some opinion on automated decisions based of personally identifiable information - of which IP address and hard drive serial number are part of.
Do you recall signing a terms of service consenting to having an algorithm automate your access here you explicitly consented to what information is captured and stored?
Valid points I agree.
Guess it was more your judgement of the investigation part I disagreed with.
I would prob also have started from top (clear cut cases, like x-realm on same IP address) and went down the tree.
Return to RvR or the latest topics