Lol, just lol.
I've been skipping the last 2-3 pages since there are quite a single-direction debates between people, I also agree that the bullshits are distracting for the real arguments.. but once again, what's the point of this discussion?
Cause I'm still waiting for a proper reason behind this range change from the devs/staff, cause the initial one was:
The goal is to not really affect the bard gameplay in actual fights but just to make the ability for hib to force fights closer to the other realms.
And the solution to this so called issue was already written in the subsequent phrase:
A possible alternative would have been to only make the combat flag happen when the target is below a certain range
Which would have been the
most fitting solution to the "problem" that caused this whole fuss.
So, why would you change the range at all? Technical difficulties on implementing such mechanic maybe?
I'm honestly curious, truly.
______________
On a side note, I've really laughted a bit at this statement.
Sepplord wrote: ↑Mon 20 Apr 2020 7:34 AM
Please explain how the mezzinteraction between sorc and bard changes at all, with a reduction of the amnesia range.
Seriously, please describe the step where bard used amnesia on the sorc before being within 1850range.
This bullshit argument gets repeated here again and again, and it is just distracting from the real arguments
Playing a bard at some high tier level would have helped you out on this question.
When you play a support class such Bard (yes, a CC class is a support!) your goal is not only to just deny enemies and preserve yourself... but also preserve your team mates.
Therefore YES, you will use amnesia LOT before 1850 range if you want to deny a spellcast (I.E. mezz/root) on your frontline group mates which are in front of you.
Got it now? It wasn't that hard after all!Also, nerfing the range of amnesia to only
one realm is yet another stupid choice.
You can efficently spam amnesia on a rooted bard to prevent him to demez or do anything else
(HELLO MOC!?)Please, re-think about it cause there is a simpler way to solve it and you wrote it in the first post of this thread.