The spam limits in this game, i.e. advice, taunts, etc, are ridiculous. You can't even hold a conversation because of them and they really serve no purpose. Punishment should be for extreme circumstances, not the norm.
Druth wrote: ↑Thu 11 Jul 2019 5:45 AMAdvice is used wrong, not meant for a conversation.
It's meant for people to Ask, and others to respond.
Some use it for discussing with people, but that was never the intend.
doppel wrote: ↑Thu 11 Jul 2019 4:40 PMDruth wrote: ↑Thu 11 Jul 2019 5:45 AMAdvice is used wrong, not meant for a conversation.
It's meant for people to Ask, and others to respond.
Some use it for discussing with people, but that was never the intend.
Sometimes you have follow up questions, or a simple "thank you" would be convenient.
Sepplord wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 7:33 AM
why do you expect more effort from me than you put in yourself?
It is clear from your opening post, that you want to use advice chat for conversations, which is specificly NOT wanted, yet you claim the thing that stops you from continually misusing the advice-chat serves no purpose
But immediatly i am the bad guy and "the reason" for chat-timers
I sense a little hypocrisy there
stinsfire wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 9:29 AMSepplord wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 7:33 AM
why do you expect more effort from me than you put in yourself?
It is clear from your opening post, that you want to use advice chat for conversations, which is specificly NOT wanted, yet you claim the thing that stops you from continually misusing the advice-chat serves no purpose
But immediatly i am the bad guy and "the reason" for chat-timers
I sense a little hypocrisy there
Well the thing is.. sometimes you ask a question and others who are also interested join in, but after your question and the first response the only way to ask more questions is send tells to the person who ansswered you. Problem is, that the otthers who are also interested don't get to see the answers and may have to keep asking in advice or also send him messages.
I understand advice is not for conversations, but couldn't we increase the spam limit to like 2-3 statements per minute?
Sepplord wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 9:49 AMThe argumentation of OP, his claim that it serves no purpose and then getting offended when he get's a low effort call out was what my comment referred to.
Sepplord really loves to watch himself post. He’s a beast in that respect so watch out.doppel wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 5:21 PMSepplord wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 9:49 AMThe argumentation of OP, his claim that it serves no purpose and then getting offended when he get's a low effort call out was what my comment referred to.
I responded to your low effort response with a low effort response, and since then you justified my case that you low effortlessly countered originally, I'm not really sure what you're going for here... sounds like everyone is in agreeance the current system is over the top.
Moid wrote: ↑Fri 12 Jul 2019 10:17 PMWe should have awards for the dumbest ideas for changes to the game. I’d vote for this one to win the grand prize.
Return to Open Community Votes or the latest topics