Looking to play hunter for first time. Prefer pure archer/pet. Any spec suggestions?
Dominus wrote: ↑Mon 5 Nov 2018 9:14 PMSo I did some testing on level 50 dummy with all resists.
2 hunters. Kobold. Same Starting Stats. Same RAs (Aug Dex 5, MOA 3, FA2, IP, Purge, LW1, Tire1)
Buffs were: combined regen, combined forces, gem of dex qui.
Bow: Tuscar Bow 5.0 speed
Spear: Phoenix Midgard Spear 5.5 speed
Hunter 1 (45 bow, 39 spear, 34 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit shot: 612 modifier 1950 x 10 shots. Got 2 shots of 605 modifier 1926
Standard shot: 302 modifier 1950 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style) 239 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 274 x 10 strikes
Hunter 2 (50 bow, 47 spear, 0 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit Shot: 627 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Standard shot: 313 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style): 249 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 289 x 10 strikes
Summary
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increase in Crit Shot damage of 15 pts
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increaase in Standard shot damage of 11 pts.
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 10 pts using Lancer
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 15 pts using Lunging Thrust.
So, Cad, I agree with your assessment and will adjust my spec to add Beastcraft.
Cadebrennus wrote: ↑Mon 12 Nov 2018 8:46 PMForgot to mention, the level 44 rear follow-up in Spear is also equivalent Growth-Rate wise to the level 50 follow-up in Blades (which doesn't have an effect in the chain at all) so you're in excellent shape with less spec points, and always at two-handed damage.
Dominus wrote: ↑Mon 5 Nov 2018 9:14 PMSo I did some testing on level 50 dummy with all resists.
2 hunters. Kobold. Same Starting Stats. Same RAs (Aug Dex 5, MOA 3, FA2, IP, Purge, LW1, Tire1)
Buffs were: combined regen, combined forces, gem of dex qui.
Bow: Tuscar Bow 5.0 speed
Spear: Phoenix Midgard Spear 5.5 speed
Hunter 1 (45 bow, 39 spear, 34 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit shot: 612 modifier 1950 x 10 shots. Got 2 shots of 605 modifier 1926
Standard shot: 302 modifier 1950 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style) 239 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 274 x 10 strikes
Hunter 2 (50 bow, 47 spear, 0 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit Shot: 627 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Standard shot: 313 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style): 249 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 289 x 10 strikes
Summary
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increase in Crit Shot damage of 15 pts
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increaase in Standard shot damage of 11 pts.
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 10 pts using Lancer
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 15 pts using Lunging Thrust.
So, Cad, I agree with your assessment and will adjust my spec to add Beastcraft.
Durgrim wrote: ↑Tue 19 Feb 2019 11:52 AMDominus wrote: ↑Mon 5 Nov 2018 9:14 PMSo I did some testing on level 50 dummy with all resists.
2 hunters. Kobold. Same Starting Stats. Same RAs (Aug Dex 5, MOA 3, FA2, IP, Purge, LW1, Tire1)
Buffs were: combined regen, combined forces, gem of dex qui.
Bow: Tuscar Bow 5.0 speed
Spear: Phoenix Midgard Spear 5.5 speed
Hunter 1 (45 bow, 39 spear, 34 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit shot: 612 modifier 1950 x 10 shots. Got 2 shots of 605 modifier 1926
Standard shot: 302 modifier 1950 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style) 239 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 274 x 10 strikes
Hunter 2 (50 bow, 47 spear, 0 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit Shot: 627 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Standard shot: 313 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style): 249 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 289 x 10 strikes
Summary
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increase in Crit Shot damage of 15 pts
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increaase in Standard shot damage of 11 pts.
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 10 pts using Lancer
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 15 pts using Lunging Thrust.
So, Cad, I agree with your assessment and will adjust my spec to add Beastcraft.
Sorry for necroing this post, but is it still in effect?
Do the other DD classes receive as less additional dmg when skilling their weapon from 45 to 50?
inoeth wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 8:08 AMDurgrim wrote: ↑Tue 19 Feb 2019 11:52 AMDominus wrote: ↑Mon 5 Nov 2018 9:14 PMSo I did some testing on level 50 dummy with all resists.
2 hunters. Kobold. Same Starting Stats. Same RAs (Aug Dex 5, MOA 3, FA2, IP, Purge, LW1, Tire1)
Buffs were: combined regen, combined forces, gem of dex qui.
Bow: Tuscar Bow 5.0 speed
Spear: Phoenix Midgard Spear 5.5 speed
Hunter 1 (45 bow, 39 spear, 34 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit shot: 612 modifier 1950 x 10 shots. Got 2 shots of 605 modifier 1926
Standard shot: 302 modifier 1950 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style) 239 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 274 x 10 strikes
Hunter 2 (50 bow, 47 spear, 0 beast, 35 stealth)
Crit Shot: 627 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Standard shot: 313 modifier 1965 x 10 shots
Lancer (spear style): 249 x 10 strikes
Lunging Thrust (spear style) 289 x 10 strikes
Summary
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increase in Crit Shot damage of 15 pts
45 vs 50 bow showed only an increaase in Standard shot damage of 11 pts.
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 10 pts using Lancer
39 vs 47 spear showed only an increase of 15 pts using Lunging Thrust.
So, Cad, I agree with your assessment and will adjust my spec to add Beastcraft.
Sorry for necroing this post, but is it still in effect?
Do the other DD classes receive as less additional dmg when skilling their weapon from 45 to 50?
yes
no
Durgrim wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 8:51 AMI mean, it completely ruins (maybe just my understanding) of an archetype, which is unique. There is no other physical ranged dmg dealing type class than the archer classes.
If the goal is to spec as high as possible in melee, may it be sword n board on alb, or dual wield on hib, or spear n pet on mid with just initial 1-2 shots with their meant to be main-weapon then I think something is misunderstood.
Didn't classic server archers had the ability to track down stuff? esp. chase assasins? wasn't there a special skill / ability for that?
M.
Durgrim wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 8:51 AMI mean, it completely ruins (maybe just my understanding) of an archetype, which is unique. There is no other physical ranged dmg dealing type class than the archer classes.
If the goal is to spec as high as possible in melee, may it be sword n board on alb, or dual wield on hib, or spear n pet on mid with just initial 1-2 shots with their meant to be main-weapon then I think something is misunderstood.
Didn't classic server archers had the ability to track down stuff? esp. chase assasins? wasn't there a special skill / ability for that?
M.
Durgrim wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 9:54 AMI do read a lot about skills, specs and playstyles to make the archer a hybrid.
But where is the solution and the result in playing and thus beneficial speccing the archer as archetype?
One could argue here and say, the hunter is designed to be a initial archer but then draws heavy combat with his spear and pet. Okay, could live with that.
But what about Rangers and Scouts then? Do we have a designed Archetype Archer at all? Maybe it makes more sense to spec an armsman into crossbow
Cadebrennus wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 8:40 PMDurgrim wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 9:54 AMI do read a lot about skills, specs and playstyles to make the archer a hybrid.
But where is the solution and the result in playing and thus beneficial speccing the archer as archetype?
One could argue here and say, the hunter is designed to be a initial archer but then draws heavy combat with his spear and pet. Okay, could live with that.
But what about Rangers and Scouts then? Do we have a designed Archetype Archer at all? Maybe it makes more sense to spec an armsman into crossbow
I've run the numbers and it makes more sense to have a Castershade than an Archer who does, you know, Archery
Afuldan wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 8:52 PMCadebrennus wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 8:40 PMDurgrim wrote: ↑Wed 20 Feb 2019 9:54 AMI do read a lot about skills, specs and playstyles to make the archer a hybrid.
But where is the solution and the result in playing and thus beneficial speccing the archer as archetype?
One could argue here and say, the hunter is designed to be a initial archer but then draws heavy combat with his spear and pet. Okay, could live with that.
But what about Rangers and Scouts then? Do we have a designed Archetype Archer at all? Maybe it makes more sense to spec an armsman into crossbow
I've run the numbers and it makes more sense to have a Castershade than an Archer who does, you know, Archery
There’s some stealthers that hang out around the trees near MMG in HW. Had the ranger down to about 20%. Castershade got me. No joke. The ranged DPS assassin is real.
Afuldan wrote: ↑Thu 21 Feb 2019 12:41 AM/snip
Archery is so f'ed up right now that it's not even worth speccing for. The reason the Castershade can do so well vs Archery is that Archery damage shoots for less per shot the faster you shoot (but equal damage over time). Compare to ANY Caster in any realm (including the NS) whose damage per second (DPS) actually increases over time when they cast faster.
AngelRose wrote: ↑Wed 24 Oct 2018 7:52 AMLooking to play hunter for first time. Prefer pure archer/pet. Any spec suggestions?
Durgrim wrote: ↑Thu 21 Feb 2019 10:25 AMAngelRose wrote: ↑Wed 24 Oct 2018 7:52 AMLooking to play hunter for first time. Prefer pure archer/pet. Any spec suggestions?
I do this on my own hunter with 50 stealth, 50 archery, 30 beast, 9 spear.
Yes, its not effective in 1on1 against anyone, but for what I do with my hunter it is perfect and I like to play it like that.
inoeth wrote: ↑Thu 21 Feb 2019 1:07 PMDurgrim wrote: ↑Thu 21 Feb 2019 10:25 AMAngelRose wrote: ↑Wed 24 Oct 2018 7:52 AMLooking to play hunter for first time. Prefer pure archer/pet. Any spec suggestions?
I do this on my own hunter with 50 stealth, 50 archery, 30 beast, 9 spear.
Yes, its not effective in 1on1 against anyone, but for what I do with my hunter it is perfect and I like to play it like that.
lol
Return to Midgard or the latest topics