Let me start by making this clear: I don't believe Archery damage is gimped. Nor do I believe Rangers/Hunters/Scouts are gimped.
What I do believe is that a toon created as an ARCHER is gimped. The current consensus is for all Archer classes to forego the Archery line in favor of higher melee spec. Right now, there is simply no reason to spec higher than 35 in Archery and some would say little reason even to spec that high. That is an issue.
Buffs have a lot to do with this, but that is for another discussion.
Given the barriers to Archery damage (interrupt code, block rates, etc.) I believe the Archery line needs some help. Penetrating Arrow III at spec 50 has been suggested and I think it's a great idea. I'm happy to hear others (i.e. +0.2% archery speed per spec level?) If Rangers and Hunters were given a reason to spec more highly in Archery, we may see fewer melee specs and maybe even some groups willing to take Archers in them...
What I do believe is that a toon created as an ARCHER is gimped. The current consensus is for all Archer classes to forego the Archery line in favor of higher melee spec. Right now, there is simply no reason to spec higher than 35 in Archery and some would say little reason even to spec that high. That is an issue.
Buffs have a lot to do with this, but that is for another discussion.
Given the barriers to Archery damage (interrupt code, block rates, etc.) I believe the Archery line needs some help. Penetrating Arrow III at spec 50 has been suggested and I think it's a great idea. I'm happy to hear others (i.e. +0.2% archery speed per spec level?) If Rangers and Hunters were given a reason to spec more highly in Archery, we may see fewer melee specs and maybe even some groups willing to take Archers in them...