Could be set as instant buff instead to be a cast?
It is useless while can t be casted when fighting
It is useless while can t be casted when fighting
inoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 6:14 AMi dont think hunter pet needs another buff but i also got to say that the str/con buff is pretty useless and on live it got changed to an insta spell very early (around 1.6x)
later it was even integrated into the insta pet.
i would prefer the integrated version tbh... i dont need another butto on the bar ;D
but still i dont think there is really a need to do changes here
Anelyn77 wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 6:23 AMinoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 6:14 AMi dont think hunter pet needs another buff but i also got to say that the str/con buff is pretty useless and on live it got changed to an insta spell very early (around 1.6x)
later it was even integrated into the insta pet.
i would prefer the integrated version tbh... i dont need another butto on the bar ;D
but still i dont think there is really a need to do changes here
No offense, but archery community needs to get together and push for some love. Everyone else is getting it (soon melee style changes, procs added, better scalings, only 2 part chains) what did we get? A buff that was 2 days later nerfed and nothing else on the horizon.
If we don't push for changes, we will remain untouched and become bottom tier, worse utility and dmg than caster pets. Let's be real, we're only class that speccing in it's main line of intended dmg - Archery, gets only 2 abilities to put on action bar (3rd being the bow from inventory). Like really?
Why don't we have a pinning shot 99% snare for 10s, a multishot, a true rapid fire - fires 10 arrows at 50% dmg in 2s on your target. Volley and Sniper Shot or w/e is called the most bland and non-impressing active RA's that can't compare to anything else, nobody I know of has ever considered sniper shot, and volley is only taken to leech safely some RP's in keep sieges by hitting random peeps for insignificant dmg.
Anelyn77 wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 6:52 AMWhy? Because if you don't spec 45+ bow your bow dmg will be like throwing pebbles.
Why do you spec 50 in spear instead of 27? Because at 27 your spear will be like a pillow brought to a knife fight.
Different playstyles why is that a problem? The spell being instant would make no difference whatsoever in actual game play where hunter pets die in 2 hits from pretty much everything, it's just a QoL improvement so that the spell actually sees play in RvR too.
Anyway, more options is a good thing, instead of only 1 playstyle like it was before - go melee with IP / purge or don't play an archer.
Cheers.
inoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 9:36 AMAnelyn77 wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 6:52 AMWhy? Because if you don't spec 45+ bow your bow dmg will be like throwing pebbles.
Why do you spec 50 in spear instead of 27? Because at 27 your spear will be like a pillow brought to a knife fight.
Different playstyles why is that a problem? The spell being instant would make no difference whatsoever in actual game play where hunter pets die in 2 hits from pretty much everything, it's just a QoL improvement so that the spell actually sees play in RvR too.
Anyway, more options is a good thing, instead of only 1 playstyle like it was before - go melee with IP / purge or don't play an archer.
Cheers.
you dont get it do you?
with 27 bow a deal around 250 normal shot and i feel this is very good dmg for the investment
so the good thing is you can go 50 spear for really good melee too
still there are ppl that, god knows why, want to spec 50 bow for no reason
why not be happy with 27 bow and go melee spec?
joshisanonymous wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 3:40 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 9:36 AMAnelyn77 wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 6:52 AMWhy? Because if you don't spec 45+ bow your bow dmg will be like throwing pebbles.
Why do you spec 50 in spear instead of 27? Because at 27 your spear will be like a pillow brought to a knife fight.
Different playstyles why is that a problem? The spell being instant would make no difference whatsoever in actual game play where hunter pets die in 2 hits from pretty much everything, it's just a QoL improvement so that the spell actually sees play in RvR too.
Anyway, more options is a good thing, instead of only 1 playstyle like it was before - go melee with IP / purge or don't play an archer.
Cheers.
you dont get it do you?
with 27 bow a deal around 250 normal shot and i feel this is very good dmg for the investment
so the good thing is you can go 50 spear for really good melee too
still there are ppl that, god knows why, want to spec 50 bow for no reason
why not be happy with 27 bow and go melee spec?
Your argument against buffing bow is so freaking weird. It's basically: "I personally want to spec 50 spear, so I want speccing over 27 bow to be pointless for everyone."
inoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 4:25 PMjoshisanonymous wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 3:40 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 9:36 AMyou dont get it do you?
with 27 bow a deal around 250 normal shot and i feel this is very good dmg for the investment
so the good thing is you can go 50 spear for really good melee too
still there are ppl that, god knows why, want to spec 50 bow for no reason
why not be happy with 27 bow and go melee spec?
Your argument against buffing bow is so freaking weird. It's basically: "I personally want to spec 50 spear, so I want speccing over 27 bow to be pointless for everyone."
no its not about 50 spear its about 27 is enough and the dmg is also pretty good
joshisanonymous wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 11:44 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 4:25 PMjoshisanonymous wrote: ↑Mon 11 May 2020 3:40 PMYour argument against buffing bow is so freaking weird. It's basically: "I personally want to spec 50 spear, so I want speccing over 27 bow to be pointless for everyone."
no its not about 50 spear its about 27 is enough and the dmg is also pretty good
You're argument against making it meaningful to put poits into bow was literally "go melee spec".
chois wrote: ↑Tue 12 May 2020 7:25 AMNa u can be close to the cap even here but need blok 9 310 dex mini and 70 shield... with that u are at 43 on 45 dual and 53-56 on 60 vs other. It s an heavy investment.
Varano wrote: ↑Tue 12 May 2020 3:11 PMInstant pet buff would be nice.
Right now on my hunter when I put my pet on someone and try to kite while my pet hits them they are literally gaining HP from their armor procs heal/lifetap.
Pet is virtually useless for anything besides interrupt and gets 2-3 shotted almost always, also attacks so slow you could probably cast through its attacks.
The pets sprint speed is the only thing it has going for it.
Maybe give pet disease proc chance?
Noashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 9:34 AMThe pet is so usless it's the first thing I kill when I 1vs1 a hunter because otherwise it outdps me as a ranger (hello, my left hand hits at 70, so yeah it's even worst vs a heal proc...)
So it's a nice add dmg, doubled as a health buffer (each swing for the pet is one swing the hunter doesn't have to take)
inoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 10:41 AMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 9:34 AMThe pet is so usless it's the first thing I kill when I 1vs1 a hunter because otherwise it outdps me as a ranger (hello, my left hand hits at 70, so yeah it's even worst vs a heal proc...)
So it's a nice add dmg, doubled as a health buffer (each swing for the pet is one swing the hunter doesn't have to take)
you should easily outdmg the pet because it hits not very fast in fact you should hit around twice as fast as the pet
Noashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 12:26 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 10:41 AMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 9:34 AMThe pet is so usless it's the first thing I kill when I 1vs1 a hunter because otherwise it outdps me as a ranger (hello, my left hand hits at 70, so yeah it's even worst vs a heal proc...)
So it's a nice add dmg, doubled as a health buffer (each swing for the pet is one swing the hunter doesn't have to take)
you should easily outdmg the pet because it hits not very fast in fact you should hit around twice as fast as the pet
I say the hunter out dps me on the long run, not the pet alone.
inoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 12:51 PM
phew maybe that was bad RNG but yesterday had a fight vs a rr7 ranger and he totally destroyed me, every swing 250 dmg. we both had dq+asr and the pet hitted as slow as me, but the ranger was still faster obviously.
so the pet hits as fast as a debuffed 2h user but just does 1h dmg plz buff my class
Noashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 1:53 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 12:51 PMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 12:26 PMI say the hunter out dps me on the long run, not the pet alone.
phew maybe that was bad RNG but yesterday had a fight vs a rr7 ranger and he totally destroyed me, every swing 250 dmg. we both had dq+asr and the pet hitted as slow as me, but the ranger was still faster obviously.
so the pet hits as fast as a debuffed 2h user but just does 1h dmg plz buff my class
I don't know how he can hit you at 250, because with 301 str and 44CD, I was not hitting above 200 with the highest GR styles on evade...
Make sense if it's both hands but it wasn't clear (even if I doubt the add dmg is 30/20, it would mean his swing speed is super slow and his tempate is gimped if he hits at only 140, I hit at around 17/12 with the yellow and I am around 1.57 swing speed)inoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 1:56 PMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 1:53 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 12:51 PMphew maybe that was bad RNG but yesterday had a fight vs a rr7 ranger and he totally destroyed me, every swing 250 dmg. we both had dq+asr and the pet hitted as slow as me, but the ranger was still faster obviously.
so the pet hits as fast as a debuffed 2h user but just does 1h dmg plz buff my class
I don't know how he can hit you at 250, because with 301 str and 44CD, I was not hitting above 200 with the highest GR styles on evade...
mh 140
oh 60
mh da 30
oh da 20
Noashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:08 PMMake sense if it's both hands but it wasn't clear (even if I doubt the add dmg is 30/20, it would mean his swing speed is super slow and his tempate is gimped if he hits at only 140, I hit at around 17/12 with the yellow and I am around 1.57 swing speed)
You can put the pet on his back, you can't do that with a off hand :p I guarantee you, if I don't kill the pet and the hunter has IP3 or higher, it's game over.
inoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:33 PMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:08 PMMake sense if it's both hands but it wasn't clear (even if I doubt the add dmg is 30/20, it would mean his swing speed is super slow and his tempate is gimped if he hits at only 140, I hit at around 17/12 with the yellow and I am around 1.57 swing speed)
You can put the pet on his back, you can't do that with a off hand :p I guarantee you, if I don't kill the pet and the hunter has IP3 or higher, it's game over.
i loged hib after the fight and asked for spec, he said 44blade 48 pf 22 cd and he also hitted higher with spectrum blade but average was around 140 mh.
maybe also 11.3 da proced not sure about that, but on my ranger i also hit for around 30/20 with the high DAs.
it does not matter so much if you are on swing cap vs hunters because for hunters its not possible to reach swing cap and if debuffed dq and 30% asr you end up with like 2.5s anyway.
also if the hunter misses or gets evaded he loses straight 160 dmg every time where the ranger possibly can still land an off hand the the other way around.
im glad that there are not many melee rangers anymore tbh, they are really giving me troubles, sometimes even more than champions
Noashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:40 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:33 PMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:08 PMMake sense if it's both hands but it wasn't clear (even if I doubt the add dmg is 30/20, it would mean his swing speed is super slow and his tempate is gimped if he hits at only 140, I hit at around 17/12 with the yellow and I am around 1.57 swing speed)
You can put the pet on his back, you can't do that with a off hand :p I guarantee you, if I don't kill the pet and the hunter has IP3 or higher, it's game over.
i loged hib after the fight and asked for spec, he said 44blade 48 pf 22 cd and he also hitted higher with spectrum blade but average was around 140 mh.
maybe also 11.3 da proced not sure about that, but on my ranger i also hit for around 30/20 with the high DAs.
it does not matter so much if you are on swing cap vs hunters because for hunters its not possible to reach swing cap and if debuffed dq and 30% asr you end up with like 2.5s anyway.
also if the hunter misses or gets evaded he loses straight 160 dmg every time where the ranger possibly can still land an off hand the the other way around.
im glad that there are not many melee rangers anymore tbh, they are really giving me troubles, sometimes even more than champions
Yeah those are not how probalities work mate :p if you hit more, the ennemy you will evade you at the same rate
if he has 22cd, he will NOT hit you at 250 each round... if he is RR 8, he has around 59.5% chances to hit off hand. So no it's not 250 per round just saying.
inoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:46 PMNoashakra wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:40 PMinoeth wrote: ↑Thu 14 May 2020 2:33 PMi loged hib after the fight and asked for spec, he said 44blade 48 pf 22 cd and he also hitted higher with spectrum blade but average was around 140 mh.
maybe also 11.3 da proced not sure about that, but on my ranger i also hit for around 30/20 with the high DAs.
it does not matter so much if you are on swing cap vs hunters because for hunters its not possible to reach swing cap and if debuffed dq and 30% asr you end up with like 2.5s anyway.
also if the hunter misses or gets evaded he loses straight 160 dmg every time where the ranger possibly can still land an off hand the the other way around.
im glad that there are not many melee rangers anymore tbh, they are really giving me troubles, sometimes even more than champions
Yeah those are not how probalities work mate :p if you hit more, the ennemy you will evade you at the same rate
if he has 22cd, he will NOT hit you at 250 each round... if he is RR 8, he has around 59.5% chances to hit off hand. So no it's not 250 per round just saying.
yes i know on paper it works like that, thats why i said bad luck with RNG, it was more like 90% oh hits. and i must say that happens alot!
Return to Ask the Team or the latest topics