Just for the record here, I'm not opposed to having /rp and /xp off. I believe they should be in since some players will simply prefer to stay in BGs forever, with or without the commands. No need to force them into rerolling.
Tyton wrote: ↑Sun 29 Jul 2018 4:26 PM
I'm indifferent. There is already a bonus, but the fact is you level so fast at 20-24, for instance, that there's not much time spent in Thid. And in other zones you can progress (move on to the next camp) where as BG you go for couple levels, then you have to leave.
What you say is interesting though. 20-24 isn't a lot of time spent XPing at all if you're in a decent group. Even with the quicker teleports, it sometimes just isn't worth going to BGs because it's too much moving around if you're already in a decent zone.
It might be an interesting idea to open up Thidranki from level 15 to 24 and to only have one BG after that from 25 to 34. This way, spending time early on in the BGs would provide you with massive XP benefits if you could get a kill on a high level player. Also, the level range is large enough to consider staying in the BG as a viable way to progress your character.
Broadening the level ranges and making the BGs more attractive both for XP as for Gear would eventually create a realistic training ground for playstyles that can later (at levels 35+) be used in the Frontiers by players who have the balls to XP through RvR from levels 15-50.
In my opinion, leveling through RvRing from the beginning of the BGs to 50 should -at least in theory- be more than a viable option if you know what you're doing. As long as you feel like you're wasting time RvRing (in terms of XP progression) this simply won't work.
Quik wrote: I really think we should have 1-4/5-9 BG's exactly FOR the new players. Let them get going early and see what its like before it starts getting tough.
I don't think this is a good idea because it will only thin out the BG population even more. In turn, this will create the perception that BGs are a waste of time. Keeping it simple and accessible seems to me to be the better option.
I do agree that simple RvR should be easily accessible though.