jg777 wrote: ↑Sat 2 Mar 2019 6:01 PM
Quik wrote: ↑Sat 2 Mar 2019 5:13 PM
jg777 wrote: ↑Sat 2 Mar 2019 5:10 PM
It's not being petty, it's being realistic in what RvR should be on Phoenix. It's attempting to improve the whole RvR experience on the server. While "afk waiting" may be a thing for 35-50's presently, it's because the task design is flawed- that can (and needs to be) changed. People need to be actively contributing/participating to gain credit for these tasks- and lowbies will rarely if ever meet that criteria. Battlegrounds, which will require active contributing/participating to get realm points, is where players pre 35 need to be to get realm points.
Wewill have to agree to disagree on this one.
I really can't see how you can justify a lvl 45 who is going afk and waiting for his free rp's and xp is better then a lvl 20 who is running with a zerg and who is nuking/mezzing and trying to actually get involved...
Grey or not at least the lowbie is actively participating and getting involved while the 45 is literally afk and leeching his free reward.
I’m not talking about the current set up but the future set up where no one is afk sitting for free Realm points. Making a point of the occasional lowbie trying to get a spell off or hit an almost dead player or a 45 afk’ing is outside the norm in general and no one will be getting credit to afk once tasks get adjusted (well my hope anyway). It’s not something I consider a valid reason to not implement the presented idea above. The vast majority of lowbies are just looking for a quick death/credit for task then leaving in the current state of the task system.
Can’t we agree we should aim for all players to actively and meaningfully participate in RvR to get credit (Realm points)? Even if we disagree on how to go about that I’d hope we have that common ground.
I 100% agree that as long as someone is participating they should get credit.
The only issue with it is the same for a grey as a lvl 50, say I have a lvl 50 RM who is running out to get task credit and I get to the MMG and a NS stuns and kills me (yeah this never happens lol) right before the timer ends, my feeling is I should get credit.
On the flip side if I am a 50 RM and I am just running out to get killed by the first enemy player I see and they hit me just before timer ends, techinally I shouldn't get credit but the only difference between the 2 scenarios is intent.
This is why I find it hard to police this.
If I want to take my 25 Thane out to the mid zerg and get involved and I am actively nuking people and attacking and maybe even stunning a few with my side shield positional, I should get credit. I understand I am not worth RP's and I also understand I should be since I am participating, but in this scenario I am more active then dozens of lvl 50's who simply ran out to suicide before afking at the portal keep.
This is my issue with people saying only 35 and under or 40 and under should get credit, in what world is it better for a lvl 45 to run out and suicide before AFKing then for a lvl 25 Thane who is activily trying to help his realm mates by throwing a few stuns or small interrupting nukes?